The Environment as a political issue is widespread. It covers:
- climate change
- loss of biodiversity
- soil contamination and erosion
- clean drinking water
FOLLOW UP TO TOWN HALL 4/17: NRDC & THE SIERRA CLUB
There is hope. That was the message delivered by Alex and David Olsen of the Sierra Club on Monday, April 17th. California has special protections and a strategy in place in case any of those protections are threatened by the barrage of anti-environmental protection orders and legislation coming from Washington. These threats form a long list that’s about to get longer. However, California can continue to be the beacon of progress as the world and the United States looks to it as a leader of environmental protection. Moreover, what happens in California radically affects other states.
Support AB378: The state’s cap-and-trade program requires companies to buy permits to release greenhouse gas emissions (meaning: major polluters buy credits for their carbon emissions). Although AB378 wants to extend this program, due to expire in 2020, and supports its goal to reduce emissions to 40 percent below 1990 levels by 2030, lawmakers and the NRDC are concerned that the benefits have not reached all communities. Predominantly low-income and minority communities are disproportionately impacted by greenhouse gas emissions, but have not seen the same jobs and economic development in the green energy sector, or improvements to health and quality of life, that other regions have under the current law.
Here is a template of a long form NRDC Support Letter to Assemblymember Cristina Garcia. You can use this as an example to craft your own letter or download one of our short form letters (it is in Word form so you can revise it if you wish and either keep or delete the Citizens Rise logo):
THE SIERRA CLUB
Board of Directors and Staff
Santa Clara Valley Water District
5750 Almaden Expressway
San Jose, CA 95118
The word “fix” is misleading. This initiative consists of two pipelines, 30 miles long, 40 feet each in diameter, and 150 feet below ground. It is expensive ($15-67 billion project) with major cost uncertainties when water and conservation organizations have low cost, many existing solutions that would not further damage the environment and be half the cost. Here are the talking points:
The amount of additional water to be obtained is very small, particularly compared to the cost of building tunnels
Many unresolved issues remain for how tunnels would be managed. There’s great uncertainty
MORE CALIFORNIA ENVIRONMENTAL LEGISLATION NEWS
Find out about the #PreserveCA package: Three new bills were recently introduced by California Senate Pro Tem Kevin de León and other state champions, all designed to protect California against environmental harm from the anti-environment antics of the Trump Administration and Congress. These bills can be a model for other states that want to protect against environmental civil rights damage coming from Washington, D.C. [full blog on Preserve CA package]
Assembly Bill 1405
California Assembly Speaker pro Tem Kevin Mullin has introduced AB 1405 to deploy more clean energy resources during peak electricity demand, in order to meet the State’s 2030 greenhouse gas (GHG) and renewable energy targets.
“California’s goals of 50% Renewable Portfolio Standard (RPS) by 2030, 40% greenhouse gas reductions below 1990 levels by 2030, and providing reliable, cost-effective electricity to energy customers are laudable, but ultimately incongruous in the absence of a policy framework and new market mechanisms to allow California’s Independent System Operator (CAISO) to manage the impacts of increasing renewables penetration” said Mullin.
Save the Election Assistance Commission
- Committee on House Administration: (202) 225-8281 / email
- Chairman Harper: (202) 225-5031
- Ranking Member Brady: (202) 225-4731
CLIMATE JUSTICE: On January 24, President Donald Trump signed an order that makes it easier for Energy Transfer Partners (ETP) to complete its controversial Dakota Access Pipeline (DAPL) in North Dakota. Trump also issued a memorandum clearing the way for the Keystone XL pipeline.
The public process is still in play. It is not a done deal.
This is an executive memorandum and just how much Trump can authorize is unclear. This is the best explanation of the legislative analysis of the pipeline process that must happen following this presidential order that I have read. In summation: nothing is set and we still have a voice.